A Compare And Contrast Essay On Abortion And Adoption

A Compare And Contrast Essay On Abortion And AdoptionA compare and contrast essay on abortion and adoption might just be the most difficult and important essay you ever write. This is a really tough subject because it involves things that people do not like to talk about. However, by carefully considering your topic and writing in a calm and methodical manner, it can be done.You can get caught up in this difficult subject if you let it. When you are writing an essay that deals with this subject, you should feel the emotion you are dealing with when you are writing. You must think about the emotions that you are feeling when you are writing about the subject. These types of essays are sometimes called 'situation' based essays.If you are really comfortable with this type of essay, then you are well on your way to completing the assignment. However, if you find that you are having a difficult time dealing with emotions, this is going to slow you down when you are trying to write the ess ay. You should also remember that you are in control of your emotions. Once you have accepted the feelings that you are dealing with, you should then decide how to approach the situation.The key to handling this type of essay is to make sure that you are as honest as possible. When you are faced with a difficult topic, you will need to draw from your experiences to make your argument. By making use of your experiences, you will be able to express what it is like to be in that situation.This will be the best way to illustrate how you reacted to the subject at hand in the essay. You can also take advantage of your writing skills to make the essay more effective. Simply taking the time to pause and think is all you will need to make this type of essay work for you. Youcan then use what you have learned to make an excellent argument.There are many different ways that you can make the essay more effective. Some of these include using 'uncaptioned' fonts to make the subject easier to read . You should also make sure that you are using bolding and italics. By doing this, it will make the essay look more professional.Abortion and adoption are topics that are very sensitive for many people. You will need to use your best judgment when it comes to writing the essay. You do not want to scare people off with the way that you speak.It is best to make sure that you consider the feelings you are dealing with before you begin writing your essay. Doing so will make it easier for you to present an essay that is less difficult. You will also find that you are able to make better arguments in this type of essay.

Maggie Obituary Essays - Maggie, Stephen Crane,

Maggie Obituary Margaret Johnson, only daughter of Mary Murphy: found dead in the East River at age 23 Margaret Johnson, also called Maggie, was a successful seamstress and the only daughter of Mary Murphy died on November 19 in the East River where she was spotted floating atop the freezing cold water. The cause of death seems to be suicide due to a longing case of depression but there are still tests being done on the body. Because of the poverty Maggie was born into she did not have the chance to learn how to swim which leads to the thought of her getting hypothermia once she either jumped or got pushed in the river. Maggie was said to be a very intelligent young lady who was always very popular around the men. She was also said to be very dependent and that was clearly seen when she ran away from home and went straight to a guy friend of hers whose name will not be released. As soon as they realized their differences she quickly ran back home to her mother who then rejected her, claiming that she was the ?devil.? Earlier in her short, prosperous life Maggie had to deal with the death of both her baby brother and her father, the one close family member that protected her in tough times that she often encountered. Margaret Johnson is survived by a brother Jimmie Johnson and her mother Mary Murphy. Bibliography: www.maggie.com maggie: girl of the streets by stephen crane

Genetic Engineering

Genetic Engineering Free Online Research Papers Genetic engineering allows scientists to create plants, animals, and other organisms by manipulating their genes in an unnatural manner. Thorough research shows that genetic engineering is a very risky process. While this technique â€Å"increases our understanding of nature and can provide new medical tools†, scientists’ understanding of genetics is limited, and they don’t know the long-term affects it will have on people and the environment (Greenpeace). Genetic engineering is unnatural, unpredictable, and can have a very harmful impact on society with the alteration of life-forms. There are many serious dangers that genetic manipulation presents, I will discuss its weaknesses, health, and environmental hazards. Our civilization as a whole is affected by genetic engineering. It questions our ethics and morals towards other life forms, and allows the use of biological warfare, and tests religious beliefs. Genetic engineers have very imprecise technology. When they move genes from one organism to another, a gene can be precisely cut from the DNA of an organism; however, inserting the gene into the target’s DNA is done at random. This runs the risk of disrupting the functions of other genes that are essential to the life of that organism (Mothers for Natural Law). The understanding of living systems is too limited to perform DNA surgery without causing mutations that can be harmful to the environment and peoples’ health. One way that genetic engineers profit is by patenting genetically engineered seeds. Farmers using genetically engineered seeds in their crops, which have identical genetic structure, can have widespread crop failure if a fungus, virus, or pest develops and attacks the crop. â€Å"These genetically engineered seeds can be carried by insects, birds, and the wind into other fields, and elsewhere. The pollen from genetically engineered plants can cross-pollinate with natural crops and other wild plants. This means that all crops are vulnerable to contamination from cross-pollination† (Mothers for Natural Law). Is a threat to our entire food supply and biodiversity not also a threat to our survival and future evolution? No one knows if genetically engineered foods are safe without long-term safety testing, which can’t be done because any new genetic material created has never existed. â€Å"Genetic engineering can cause unexpected mutations in an organism, which can create new and higher levels of toxins in foods† (Mothers for Natural Law). It can also produce unknown allergens in foods. Many foods can be misleading to consumers by looking fresh and healthy from genetic engineering, but are actually old and have very little nutritional value left. For example, a shiny, perfectly round apple in a store could really be eight weeks old and you could never tell the difference. Scientists use genes in our crops that are resistant to antibiotics. Therefore, genetically engineered crops carry genes that can be picked up by bacteria, making the bacteria antibiotic resistant (Mothers for Natural Law). These bacteria can infect whoever ingests it, with no cure. Farmers hope to grow crops in the future â€Å"containing their own fungicides and pesticides, substances made inside the cells of each plant instead of being absorbed artificially through spraying† (Dixon). These substances would have to be non-toxic to humans, and be prevented from leaving the sap into the harvested seed, which could be very risky. There could be many side-effects to eating food from crops â€Å"programmed to fill themselves with home-made poisons† (Dixon). Consumers have the right to be protected from the dangers of genetically engineered food. In many countries, including the United States, food manufacturers and corporations are failing to inform the public about genetically engineered ingredients in their products. â€Å"Information about a product would enable and assist consumers who would want to take a precautionary approach in their food choices† (Greenpeace). Public health agencies can’t trace any problems back to their source without proper food labels, so if anyone gets sick from a genetically engineered food or bacteria, it’s extremely difficult to find and recall it. In some countries, supermarkets have cleared genetically engineered foods from their shelves, and some global food companies have removed genetically engineered ingredients from their products. â€Å"In addition, some leading pig and poultry producers have promised not to supply animals with genetically engineered feed† (Greenpeace) . â€Å"It is vitally important that the potential and also the limitations of genetic engineering be made accessible to a wide public† (Mckelvey). Commercial interests have denied most people the choice to avoid genetically engineered foods. It’s estimated that the amount of herbicide use will increase, while scientists make genetically engineered plants herbicide-resistant, which should make its use more abundant. Also, genetically engineered crops manufacture their own pesticides. This puts more pesticides into our food and crops than ever (Mothers for Natural Law). A genetically engineered organism may compete with wild relatives, which â€Å"causes unforeseen changes in the environment† (Mothers for Natural Law). Local ecology will then be left damaged. It’s impossible to contain gene pollution once â€Å"genetically engineered organisms, bacteria, and viruses are released into the environment† (Mothers for Natural Law). The integrity of our environment is too crucial to our survival to be put at such a risk. Genetically engineered organisms shouldn’t be released into the food chain or the environment until their effects can be reliably predicted (Greenpeace). â€Å"There are three types of â€Å"modern† genetic engineering used on animals† (The Virtual High School). The first one is called xenografting, which uses human DNA in animals, and vice versa. In most cases, humans have been given animal tissue and valves. Scientists were successful in giving humans pig hearts and valves, but weren’t sure why or how it worked. Attempts will be made to also have pigs grow human hearts with human DNA. Cloning animals has been successful in some cases. It has a â€Å"great potential as a money making industry and also in producing genetically identical animals for testing† (The Virtual High School). Cloning is done by inserting DNA from one animal into the fetus of the same species with a vector that is supposed to replace the embryo’s DNA with the new. The new DNA can be rejected by the fetus, making them very susceptible to mutations and miscarriages. It is very likely that cloned animals will remain infertile. Th ere are many downfalls and failed attempts that result from cloning animals. Gene manipulation has had good and bad results in changing animals’ DNA. There has been success with one pig being engineered to â€Å"produce human insulin that can be used to treat diabetes† (The Virtual High School). Scientists are making certain pigs viable for heart and valve transplants in humans. However, major problems with these manipulations lie in the vast differences between animals and humans. â€Å"Even once pig hearts can be used in humans they will still have a different circulatory system and life expectancy to contend with among other problems† (The Virtual High School). Genetic engineering has no morality and complete disrespect towards its victims. Animals are sentient beings. Their well-being is very important to the environment and our future. â€Å"The human food supply is already inundated with excesses of animal products so it is difficult to justify the suffering involved in the genetic engineering of animals by touting an increase in animal production† (HSUS). Production limits on most farms are already at their peak. Increasing animal production through genetic engineering results â€Å"in widespread pain and suffering for farm animals. Genetically engineered animals are as sensitive to physical and psychological suffering as are other animals† (HSUS). There are few survivors of genetic engineering, while most genetically engineered animals die as embryos, or from behavior problems and pain. â€Å"What can be done with genetic engineering far surpasses what researchers can know and predict† (HSUS). The failures have out weighed the benefits in the genetic engineering of innocent animals. How does genetic engineering surpass hundreds of years of selective breeding, where animals were unharmed in the process of choosing desired characteristics? Genetic engineers have begun to modify human genes. Their three approaches include cloning, somatic cell manipulation, and human germ-line manipulation. â€Å"Cloning uses the DNA of an existing individual to create a new individual† (Massey). Humans haven’t been cloned yet, but it’s being attempted. The two different types of cloning are â€Å"embryo cloning,† which could create new human parts for replacements of failed body parts, and â€Å"reproductive cloning,† which would produce a complete new person as a genetic copy of another (Massey). Their only difference would be the experiences and environment that the clone grows up with. â€Å"In the U.S., federal funds cannot be used for reproductive cloning, but there is no federal law against it† (Massey). Somatic cell manipulation is also called â€Å"gene therapy†.†Somatic cells do not pass DNA to the next generation† (Massey). Manipulation of these cells adds genes to existing cells in part of the human body. The effects of this process can be lethal. â€Å"In one case, a teenager died after researchers at the University of Pennsylvania tried to introduce genes into his liver cells, using a modified virus to carry the genes to their destination. Evidence suggests that the virus invaded many organs and triggered a severe immune reaction† (Massey). The FDA (Food and Drug Administration) says that this process has the threat of changing or disrupting the functions of existing DNA, and also â€Å"introduces foreign genes into the patient’s sperm or egg cells† (Massey). This may change the genetic information passed to the child from the parent. Out of all trials made, most failed, and all of the patients involved were never cured. Germline manipulation changes germ cells that will be inherited by successive generations. This idea is to design people of the future. The changes to inheritable characteristics passed on to next generations would be permanent. The â€Å"aim to improve future generations of human beings† is unnecessary because it can’t relieve any sicknesses in an existing person, and other measures to produce a healthier child can be taken, for example, using donated sperm or eggs (Massey). Eugenics is unethical because no one has the right to change a person’s DNA to make them more superior, without their consent, and also who is going to judge whether or not a person has undesirable traits? There is a new and extremely deadly threat to be afraid of that could kill and infect millions of people. â€Å"Biological warfare involves the use of living organisms for military purposes† (Rifkin). The tools and materials needed to create biological warfare agents are easily accessible and cheap. â€Å"The new genomic information being discovered and used for commercial genetic engineering in fields of agriculture, animal husbandry, and medicine is potentially convertible to the development of a wide range of novel pathogens that can attack plant, animal, and human populations† (Rifkin). The ability to design and mass-produce these weapons isn’t difficult to gain. Graduate students in laboratories everywhere have the capabilities, which is very alarming. Most biological pathogens can develop feasible niches and live indefinitely in the environment that they are released into. This technology was hardly used because of the danger it poses and high cost of mater ials, however, â€Å"advances in genetic engineering technologies over the past decade, have made biological warfare viable for the first time† (Rifkin). These â€Å"designer weapons† can be created in various ways, programming genes to become micro-organisms that infect with higher antibiotic resistance and environmental stability. â€Å"Scientists say they may be able to clone selective toxins to eliminate specific racial or ethnic groups whose genotypic makeup predisposes them to certain disease patterns. Genetic engineering can also be used to destroy specific strains or species of agricultural plants or domestic animals† (Rifkin). Therefore, no one is safe. Whole populations can be targeted by this weaponry, from terrorism to various military purposes. Biological warfare is claimed by governments to be used only as a defense tactic towards nature because that is all that is allowed in the existing treaty. â€Å"Yet it is widely acknowledged that it is virtually impossible to distinguish between defensive and offensive research in the field† (Rifkin). Any laboratory, no matter how secure and contained it is, isn’t failsafe. Security breaches and natural disasters are always possible, as well as terrorists turning to biological warfare. Biotech companies want to limit protocols and enforced provisions to protect their trade secrets and commercial information. Negotiators must overlook these companies’ commercial desires and look out for the welfare of the people (Rifkin). Everyone is at risk of an attack by these new destructive and easily accessible weapons. Researchers from Europe and America have made the most biotechnology progress. Religion and God have made the morality of genetic engineering a serious question. Many geneticists move to Asia because they have fewer restrictions and new labs to work with. There, they have â€Å"a different view of divinity and the afterlife. Therapeutic cloning in particular jibes well with the Buddhist and Hindu ideas of reincarnation† (Tierney). China, India, Singapore, and other Eastern countries support embryo cloning for medical research and genetically engineered crops. Europe doesn’t accept genetically engineered crops, but cloning is supported in England and other countries. However, it is banned in many including France and Germany. North and South America use genetically engineered crops but ban cloning research. Christians and many Eastern religions are divided among their beliefs and issues with genetic engineering. â€Å"Traditional Christians† believe it is wrong to clone human embryos and harm them during research. On the other hand, they don’t worry too much about genetically engineering animals and plants because they are considered â€Å"lower† than humans (Tierney). Some â€Å"New Age Thinkers† (post-Christians), believe that the natural world shouldn’t be tampered with. Environmental activists and some conservatives campaigned to ban embryo cloning. â€Å"A Green Party leader in Germany, Vocker Beck, referred to cloned embryonic stem-cell research as â€Å"veiled cannibalism† (Tierney). However, many critics of genetic engineering don’t use their religious beliefs to oppose it, many â€Å"focus on the possible dangers to ecosystems and human health† (Tierney). Some leading opponents of cloning say they are defending â€Å"hum an dignity†, not religion. If scientists figured out how to use stem-cell research to treat diseases, then it’s likely that people will accept it in the future. Cloning is hardly supported by the public, and many scientists don’t wish to pursue it because of the danger it would pose for the child (Tierney). â€Å"Even if human cloning becomes safe, it may never have much demand because most people will prefer having children the old-fashioned way† (Tierney). The battle between the natural world and the scientific world will mold our society for the future. Our natural environment has brought our people so far, does it not fulfill its purpose anymore, to the point where it must be tampered with? Genetic scientists are altering life itself. Our environment has become a huge experiment that poses irreversible effects. Everything that lives on this earth is needed to continue our evolution, but it is all being put in danger from genetic engineering. Our ethical limits are being tested, where do we draw the line? Different beliefs and peoples’ motives make these decisions very difficult to litigate. Keeping the entire world more informed on experiments and their outcomes from genetic engineering would help everyone figure out where they stand on the subject, whether they agree or disagree with it. People need to consider if the lives’ being tested and mutated in the process are worth being jeopardized. Research thus far has proved that genetic engineering has had no advantages towards the way we live our lives now. Dixon, Dr. Patrick. Genetic Revolution. Dixon, Dr. Patrick. Genetic Revolution. Kingsway, 1995. Greenpeace. www.greenpeace.org. 25 April 2003. HSUS. www.hsus.org/pets. Massey, Rachel. www.sfsu.edu. 15 March 2001. www.sfsu.edu. Mckelvey, Maureen D. Evolutionary Innovations: The Business of Biotechnology. Mckelvey, Maureen D. Evolutionary Innovations: The Business of Biotechnology. Oxford University Press, 2000. 76. Mothers for Natural Law. www.safe-food.org. Rifkin, Jeremy. www.sfsu.edu. 27 September 2001. www.sfsu.edu. The Virtual High School. www.govhs.org. www.govhs.org. Tierney, John. www.nytimes.com. 20 November 2007. www.nytimes.com. Research Papers on Genetic EngineeringBionic Assembly System: A New Concept of SelfOpen Architechture a white paperStandardized TestingRiordan Manufacturing Production PlanLifes What IfsEffects of Television Violence on ChildrenRelationship between Media Coverage and Social andMarketing of Lifeboy Soap A Unilever ProductThe Project Managment Office SystemPETSTEL analysis of India

What is the Future of the Humanities Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words - 11

What is the Future of the Humanities - Essay Example The films and literature are considered so easy to master, and most of the people believe that humanities belong to the weaker students. There is also pressure from the parents and relatives to pursue science related courses. Thus, most of the students are discouraged to major in the humanities. I agree with the research that shows that, the study in humanities has reduced as students are being encouraged to enroll in science related courses. Humanities provide a platform for one to work and communicate with others. Most of the scientists are unable to communicate their ideas clearly. Scientists only work on coming up with new ideas and forget to communicate and working with others which is a crucial aspect of their lives. Through studying humanities, students develop communication skills and they can clearly articulate their ideas through both spoken and written languages (Frankly 3). They are opened up to the real world because they directly deal with individuals. Additionally, with globalization, in order to succeed in the commerce industry, people have to develop a communication strategy for them to attract a wide audience. Thus, students must learn how to communicate which only happens through enrolling in the humanities and taking them as courses. Additionally, the study of humanities enables the students to identify the future scientific needs of the society. Through the study of history, students understand the i mpact of the study of science and technology and the impact the technology has on the lives of the people. It shows the negative effects science and technology has on the lives of the people and looks for ways of eliminating the negative impacts. Subsequently, humanities form a very crucial role in our today’s life. We are living in a society where most of the young people dont know how to relate with one another. Most of the children have abandoned their culture, and they do not know their origin.

What Effects Does Reading Recovery Have on Student Learning Research Paper

What Effects Does Reading Recovery Have on Student Learning - Research Paper Example This paper seeks to explore what effects Reading Recovery has on student learning with special reference to the significance of reading recovery intervention and the various approaches employed by specialist instructors. Definition of Reading Recovery: Reading Recovery is understood as a supplementary education program for the lowest-achieving first-grade children. For Dr. Marie Clay, reading is â€Å"a message-getting, problem-solving activity which increases in power and flexibility the more it is practiced† and â€Å"that within the directional constraints of the printer’s cue, language and visual perception responses are purposefully directed by the reader in some integrated way to the problem of extracting meaning from cues in a text, in sequence, so that the reader brings a maximum of understanding to the author’s message† (Clay, 1991, p. 6). As the quotation makes it clear, the first grade learner should be trained to acquire the message behind the reading process and it is the duty of the instructor to identify the stumbling blocks before the learner and to help him for problem solution. Goal and specifics of Reading Recovery: According to Wilson and Daviss, â€Å"the goal of Reading Recovery is to dramatically reduce the number of first-grade students who have extreme difficulty learning to read and write and to reduce the cost of these learners to educational systems† (Reading Recovery: Basic Facts 2010). For this, it is essential that the instructors identify the right lowest-achieving first graders and entrust them to a specially trained Reading Recovery teacher who is able to build their confidence level and enable them to work independently in the regular classroom. The selected students are offered a half-hour lesson each school day for 12 to 20 weeks with a specially trained Reading Recovery teacher and their lessons are discontinued as soon as the teacher feels

How Young People Represented in Eastenders and Hollyoaks Essay Example for Free

How Young People Represented in Eastenders and Hollyoaks Essay Eastenders is a British Soap Opera, first broadcast in the UK on BBC1. It’s about people who works and live in the frictional London Borough of Walford in the East End of London. The scenes usually around the Albert Square. This soap originally played in the TV as two half-hour episodes per week since 2001, for episodes are broadcast each week. It is one of the UK’s highest rated programmes. It’s created by two person called Julia Smith and Tony Holland. Hollyoaks is a long running British Soap Opera firs broadcasted on Channel 4 in 1995. It’s created by Phil Redmond and Directed by Ross Knowles and Robert Duffey. This programme is set in a fictional suburb of Chester called Hollyoaks. Scenes usually around the education college called Hollyoaks Community College. The characters are people who are in their late teens or early twenties. The series are filmed at Lime Pictures. There are many conventions in the soaps. Cliff hangers are is a practice of ending of an episode which leaves the character in a seemingly impossible situation or something really exciting happens. The purpose of this that it makes the story so interesting which makes people want to watch the next episode of the soap. Moralistic storylines are usually main theme of the story; the lesson the main character learns. Usually people who watching the soap learns from that storyline. For example for a moral storyline is could be that: a girl steals another girl’s roller-skate, the moral in this that stealing is wrong. Multiple storylines are means in a soap that lots of different lines going on. For example that a lady has a baby, someone had a car crash, while the school burnt down. Realism is also important for a soap opera because who watching it has to believe in that it’s ‘real’. For example people can’t sell a pen which cost 50p for  £20.000 because it’s not realistic. Soaps are passing on social messages such as: drunk driving, young pregnancy, taking drugs and so on. The writers passing these messages to do not do any of these by showing their consequences. If people see that 5 people dies because the driver was drunk they might not going the drive when they drinking. Characters from Eastenders I’ve chosen are Stacey Slater and Bradley Branning. Stacey had arrived in Watford at the age of 15 and she stayed with her uncle Charlie. She had been causes troubles with her behavior. She had been thrown out because of her behavior. She falls in love with Bradley BranningStacey represented like a bad teenage girl with lots of boyfriends. She also had taken drugs in the past. She not very educated. She worked at a stall. She was pregnant but had an abortion. Bradley represented as a quite clever teenage boy. He has a good job at the bank. Was in a relationship with Stacey. He sexually harassed by his boss. He flirted with lots of girls/women. He flirted with her colleague as well. I’ve chosen these characters because I thought they are exciting to me. Characters from Hollyoaks are Ste Hay, He has some wicked ways. It hasnt all been plain sailing for him. A job at chez brought him into the flight path of one Brendan Brady and so began the twisted love/hate/love/hate/love romance that is Stendan. All sorts of obstacles have come between them pregnant girlfriends, fitness instructors, angry wives and long lost sons; however it was Brendans issues with his sexuality and his propensity for violence that stopped them truly being together. Leanne Holiday is a blonde, petite, button-nosed; Leanne looks all sweetness and light. She first came to the village as fiancà ©e to Lee Hunter, who was returning to the village after a five year absence. Hardcore fans will have followed their engagement in the online drama Fresher’s. Wandering eyes from both parties soon caused trouble in their relationship, Leanne snagging Doug and Lee falling for Amy. She always chases boys. Young people in Eastenders represented more badly, in there are young pregnancies and other bad stuff going around the young characters. In Hollyoaks the young people are mostly represented as a studying respectful teenager. So the young people in Eastenders represented most likely as bad, while in Hollyoaks they are represented as goods. I think in Eastenders and Hollyoaks young people are represented in the way how the young people act or behave in the real life. Some young people having in trouble some of them are behaving well and doing their work and just being normal.

The Once And Future King - Mig Essay -- essays research papers

The Once and Future King The legend of King Arthur is a tale as timeless as any other found in literature today. Introduced to us by Sir Thomas Malory during the fifteenth century in Morte d' Arthur, it was the first complete tale of Arthur's life. Countless portrayals followed for any reader interested in the tale of the boy who was destined to become King. The Once and Future King by T.H. White is certainly the most popular representation of the immortal legend of King Arthur. It is similar to the tales woven before it but White gives new meanings and modernization to the traditional story through his unique perspectives and writing. White takes the reader on a journey in the past enriched by the knowledge of the future. Most importantly, White's notion that society cannot be governed by might alone is a prevalent theme throughout the work. He expresses the ideals of 'might vs. right'; as it relates to a world much like our world today. He clearly understands that 'might'; rules the actions of individuals, but 'right'; is the ideal that we seek to obtain. As we often find, the former prevails. The novel is divided into four sections that represent periods of time in Arthur's life. The novel begins with The Sword in the Stone, the tale of Arthur's childhood. At this time, he is not referred to as Arthur but Wart. His foster brother gave him this name and it was his childhood nemesis. Early in the book, Wart finds Merlyn who becomes his tutor. One of the earliest indicatio...